|
Sphincter Police in Science
and Health
This is a reply on a listserve to someone questioning the
appropriateness of a practitioner using a new technique with
"patients" or clients.
Message text written by **** (a student)
... novel techniques should only be used with clients >if it is
in the midst of clinical research (clearly explicated to clients
involved) in order to >reduce any of the potential direct or
indirect harmful effects elucidated above.<
First, I want to make it clear that I believe empirical scientific
research is valuable and important.
But it is not the whole, or even close to the most important part of
science.
Curiosity, exploration, questions, ideas-- these are the main
ingredients of science. Empiricism is the set of measuring cups. And
some of the best cooks eyeball and go with "a pinch of this a
handful of that. "
It is un-realistic to suggest that novel techniques be used in the
midst of clinical research. I say un-realistic because that's not
the way clinical or other psych technique innovations usually
happen. They develop in practitioners' offices-- people working
every day with clients. Eventually, grad students and professors--
academics and researchers get involved and check these out. Some of
these researchers actually do a competent (as compared to expedient)
job of replicating the actual process, retaining all the key
ingredients rather than oversimplifying. This empirical research
requires much art and great skill. It is very different than simple
single variable experiments.
So often, I have seen calls for empiricism, double blind, randomized
matched controls, etc. , which are really thinly veiled negative,
cynical attacks on a budding technique. I call these people, who
literally get their kicks throwing out scientific put-downs,
Sphincter police (see www.sphincterpolice.com)
New ideas need some space to blossom and grow. It takes a group of
practitioners sharing experiences, observations, failures, train
wrecks, staggering miracles, etc. to get to a point where it an
empirical researcher can wade in and start identifying key elements,
dimensions and factors in a technique that is more complex than a
single variable, like some behavior therapy tends to be. BT is so
nice and simple, but back when I was a regular member of AABT, I
recall a poll of members which shoed that most would not choose a
behavior therapist for their own psychological help.
So.... most of what you said is true Todd, and I agree with you. But
not the part I cited above. And I, being already outside the loop of
academic science, when I feel the need to rise to the defense of
flickering new ideas, will continue to point out that comments like
yours are "correct" but are often used as a politically
correct means to attack innovation that needs room to breath. You
don't stick a needle probe into an invitroo fertilized ovum two days
after fertilization. You don't insist on a double blind study while
a new technique is just being fleshed out.
Offers to help design empirical studies, questions about how a
technique could be empirically dissected and suggestions on where to
find research funding would be more productive, rather than chants
of "Thou must empiricize or thou art evil."
In reading this response, please focus on my suggestions. I don't
mean to attack you personally by any means, since your questions
were cordial and appropriate.
Below my sign-off I've include a batch of quotations from my
personal database that I feel are relevant
Rob Kall
The only people who never fail are those who never try.
Ilka Chase
It would be an inconvenient rule if nothing could be done until
everything can be done.
Churchill, Sir Winston
"The greatest loss of time is delay and expectation, which
depends upon the future. We let go the present, which we have in our
power, and look forward to that which depends upon chance,-- and so
quit a certainty for an uncertainty
Seneca
I do not offer the old smooth prizes, but offer rough new prizes;
These are the days that must happen to you:
Whitman, Walt, Song of The Open Road
Security is a kind of death.
Tennessee Williams
One doesn't discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of
the shore for a very long time.
ANDRÉ GIDE
One can never consent to creep when one feels an impulse to soar.
HELEN KELLER
Every man has the right to risk his own life in order to save it.
JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU
Don't play for safety—it's the most dangerous thing in the world.
HUGH WALPOLE
Be daring, be different, be impractical; be anything that will
assert integrity of purpose and imaginative vision against the
play-it-safers, the creatures of the commonplace, the slaves of the
ordinary.
CECIL BEATON
There are risks and costs to a program of action, but they are far
less than the long-range risks and costs of comfortable inaction.
JOHN F. KENNEDY
Even God lends a hand to honest boldness.
MENANDER
"Come to the edge," he said. They said, "We are
afraid." "Come to the edge," he said. They came. He
pushed them . . . And they flew.
GUILLAUME APOLLINAIRE
|